Gram stain evaluation in dermatovenereology clinic and microbiology laboratories: case series

Main Article Content

Yolanda Pitra Kusumadewi
Siti Nurhayati Kholidah
Devi Artami Susetiati
Titik Nuryastuti

Keywords

bacterial vaginosis, Gram staining, Lactobacillus, vaginal discharge

Abstract

Introduction: The normal vaginal flora consists of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria; Lactobacillus sp. is the main microorganism in the vagina. In bacterial vaginosis, there is a decrease in Lactobacillus sp. and an increase in pathogenic bacteria. Direct gram staining of vaginal fluid is the standard microbiological method for diagnosing bacterial vaginosis. Gram staining allows us to distinguish between gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria based on differential staining with crystal violet iodine complex and safranin. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the gram stain results between the dermatovenereology clinic and microbiology laboratories.


Case description: Direct gram staining of vaginal or cervical swabs was carried out on women aged 19 years, women aged 29 years, and women aged 40 years. The gram staining was carried out at the dermatovenereology clinic and microbiology laboratory with different results between the two locations.


Conclusion: It is important to evaluate the process of taking vaginal fluid samples, making smears/slides, and gram staining so that the quality of the examination results is maintained

Abstract 257 | pdf Downloads 250

References

1. van Schalkwyk J, Yudin MH, Allen V, Bouchard C, Boucher M, Boucoiran I, et al. Vulvovaginitis: Screening for and Management of Trichomoniasis, Vulvovaginal Candidiasis, and Bacterial Vaginosis. J Obstet Gynaecol Canada. 2015;37(3):266–74. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30316-9
2. Corbishley CM. Microbial Flora of The Vagina and Cervix. J Clin Pathol. 1977;30(8):745–8.
3. Smith WL, Hedges SR, Mordechai E, Adelson ME, Trama JP, Gygax SE, et al. Cervical and Vaginal Flora Specimens are Highly Concordant with Respect to Bacterial Vaginosis-Associated Organisms and Commensal Lactobacillus Species in Women of Reproductive Age. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(8):3078–81.
4. Division of STD Prevention, National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention C for DC and P. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2021 [cited 2023 Sep 15]. Bacterial Vaginosis. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment-guidelines/bv.htm#:~:text=Detection of at least three,are available for BV diagnosis.
5. Bansal R, Garg P, Garg A. Comparison of Amsel’s Criteria and Nugent’s Criteria for Diagnosis of Bacterial Vaginosis in Tertiary Care Centre. Int J Reprod Contraception, Obstet Gynecol. 2019;8(2):637.
6. Coico R. Gram staining. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2005;Appendix 3:3–4.
7. Tripathi N, Sapra A. StatPearls. 2023 [cited 2023 Sep 4]. Gram Staining. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562156/
8. Smith A, Hussey M. Gram Stain Protocols. Am Soc Microbiol. 2005;(September 2005):1–9.
9. Burke V, Barnes MW. The Cell Wall and The Gram Reaction. 1929;Xvm(2).
10. Basu PS, Biswas BB, Pal MK. Molecular Mechanism of Gram Staining. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 1969;15(3):365–73.
11. Kaplan ML, Kaplan L. The Gram Stain and Differential Staining. 1933;
12. Bartholomew JW, Cromwell T, Finkelstein H. A Correlation between Iodine Permeability and The Gram Characteristic of Cells. 1959;
13. Salton MR. The Relationship between The Nature of The Cell Wall and The Gram Stain. J Gen Microbiol. 1963;30(1963):223–35.
14. Thairu Y, Usman Y, Nasir I. Laboratory Perspective of Gram Staining and Its Significance in Investigations of Infectious Diseases. Sub-Saharan African J Med. 2014;1(4):168.
15. Boyanova L. Direct Gram Staining and Its Various Benefits in The Diagnosis of Bacterial Infections. Postgrad Med. 2018;130(1):105–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2018.1398049
16. Public N. National Public Health Laboratory Services. 2009;66(page 247):247–63.
17. Jordan J. Bacterial Vaginosis Vaginal Swabs Enzyme Immunoassay ( EIA ). Lab Proced Man. 2004;
18. Orellana Miguel MA, Gómez-Lus ML, Lora D. Sensitivity of Gram Stain in The Diagnosis of Urethritis in Men. Sex Transm Infect. 2012;88(4):284–7.
19. Rotimi VO, Yakubu Z, Abudu OO, Banjo TO. Direct Gram’s Stain of Vaginal Discharge as A Means of Diagnosing Bacterial Vaginosis. J Med Microbiol. 1991;35(2):103–6.
20. Kelly KG. Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations. 3rd edition. 1990 [cited 2023 Sep 14]. Tests on Vaginal Discharge. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK288/
21. Hobbs MM, Steiner MJ, Rich KD, Gallo MF, Warner L, Macaluso M, et al. Performance of Rapid Semen Detection Tests : A Cautionary Tale. 2011;82(3):291–5.